Climate Signals: Your Weekly Climate Briefing

Climate In Action

The site formerly known as Twitter seems to have taken a wrong turn. Search results for the word climate in the newly minted “X” are teeming with climate conspiracies and looney hot takes on heatwaves, while scholarly voices appear to have mostly abandoned the world’s so-called town square.

New Energy: Jonathan Wilkinson added “energy” to his portfolio as Natural Resources Minister in the latest federal cabinet shuffle. The change potentially highlights the heavy-lifting needed to cut oil and gas emissions and build a low-emissions energy system.

Climate culprits: Human fingerprints are all over this current heatwave, at least according to Imperial College London researchers. The authors conclude—with “certainty”—that the current extreme weather spell in North America would have been “virtually impossible to occur” without human induced climate change.

Avalanche of cases: A U.K. judge threw out an activist group’s case against Shell’s board of directors, citing that the lawsuit “ignores” the company’s size and complexity. But the avalanche of climate-related lawsuits is unlikely to subside: since December 2022, 2,180 climate-related cases have been filed in 65 jurisdictions..

Thrill, baby, thrill: Actor Jamie Lee Curtis debuted a gruesome graphic novel at the San Diego Comicon about an “experimental” oil project gone wrong, leading to an eco-disaster. Plus, three breezier climate reads for the summer.

CHART OF THE WEEK

A new BloombergNEF ranking places Canada second only to Australia as a jurisdiction suitable for developing metals and minerals that are vital for energy transition. While its green metals’ reserves may not be massive, Canada’s regulatory framework and talent pool could transform the country into a metal power, the ranking shows.

ENERGY

Canada released a framework to eliminate inefficient fossil fuel subsidies—the first among G20 nations to do so. But there is a catch—six of them—that could allow the federal government to facilitate fossil fuel growth. Three carve outs that caught our attention are projects that:

#1. Enable significant net GHG reductions in Canada or internationally through Article 6 of the Paris Agreement: Canada could presumably get carbon credits if, say, Japan cuts coal consumption as a direct consequence of B.C. LNG exports to the country.

#2. Involve Indigenous groups’ participation. Economic opportunities for Indigenous groups are essential to economic reconciliation. And with proposed liquefied natural gas exports backed by Indigenous groups, and many First Nations servicing oilsands projects, the industry seems unlikely to get bogged down by the new policy.

#3. Support carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), or have a credible plan to achieve net-zero emissions by 2030. The oilsands’ biggest expense item will be unaffected by the new no-subsidy rule.

AGRICULTURE

Talk about being on the frontlines of climate change: Farmers are among the first to take an economic hit from the current heatwaves baking the world.

With harvest season weeks away, around 20 drought-hit municipalities in Saskatchewan—Canada’s bread basket—declared states of emergency. An unusually large swarm of grasshoppers (partly due to unusual climate conditions) in the province are also ravaging crops. In Alberta, some producers have abandoned crops and/or sold off livestock due to lack of rain and feed supply.

Food fight: Heatwaves in Europe and the U.S. are also hurting yield, with prices of corn, oats and soybeans rising. India, facing extreme heatwaves and flooding, is banning sale of certain rice varieties to meet domestic demand, while Russia exited a grain export deal that allowed peaceful flow of food exports from Ukraine. The series of blows risk triggering price hikes and food security challenges in many countries, the IMF warned.

New Green Revolution: There are no quick solutions, but for Canada, the challenge is to raise food production and lower emissions for a hungry world. In a series of recent reports on agriculture, RBC identified strategies that can set us on a path to produce more while emitting less. Read more here.

ZEROING IN

ChatGPT may change the world, but it could also drive pollution higher. Tech industry’s shiny new toy has a pretty formidable carbon footprint—and it’s just getting started, especially as AI frontrunners Microsoft and Alphabet build more energy-intensive data centres to meet soaring demand for new-age AI services.

Source: Stanford University, Bloomberg, Carbon Credits

Climate Signals is curated by Yadullah Hussain, Managing Editor, RBC Climate Action Institute, with contributions from the Institute’s experts.

Your Weekly Climate Briefing

Sign Up

Losing To IRA, Climate Clash, Barbie’s Footprint

Climate In Action

It’s getting apocalyptic out there, with flash floods, heat domes and wildfires setting new records—everywhere. The death of two brave firefighters and a helicopter pilot in West Canada are stark reminders of the ferocity of a wounded ecosystem. Economic flows are rattled too, with the frequency of extreme weather ravaging crops, straining power grids, and upending summer travel. One early silver lining in the hazy cloud? Visible weather disruptions are triggering change in consumer behaviour, according to one early study.

Climate policy space is heating up, too:

Climate Clash: Even U.S. climate czar John Kerry’s charm failed to sway Beijing as the world’s two major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions continue to clash. Soon after “reconnecting” with the U.S. during Kerry’s recent visit to China this week, Beijing issued a stern warning: it will not tolerate outsider interference in its climate-change policies. Co-operation on climate is on a knife-edge as the world sizzles.

New climate COP: Expect tempers to flare further as the UAE, COP28 host, unveiled a “brutally honest” agenda for the UN Climate Summit in November. Its four key themes: fast-tracking the energy transition, fixing climate finance, focusing on people’s lives and livelihoods, and full inclusivity. Not on the agenda, but likely to dominate headlines: fight over fossil fuels.

Easterly winds: Nova Scotia is emerging as a promising renewable energy destination after EverWind Fuels’s agreed to invest $1 billion in wind farms generating 530-megawatts, to power its green hydrogen and ammonia production for export markets. EverWind is also in the running to develop an $8-billion green fuels project in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Some climate adaptation tips: Birdbaths for our feathered friends, and ice vests for cyclists.

CHART OF THE WEEK

Canada’s crisp, blue skies are replaced by a smoky, grey blanket as wildfires rage across the country. And the costs are real: at its peak year-to-date, 2,000-plus workers were engaged in fighting fire, around three times the 10-year average. While Canada’s recent National Adaptation Strategy set goals for 2025 and beyond, it feels like we need to take action now.

Source: Canadian Wildland Fire Information System

CRITICAL MINERALS

The Ring of Fire is emblematic of Canada’s critical minerals potential: promising but lacking political capital to get major projects on the starting line.

Northern potential: Indigenous buy-in is key for mine development in the Northern Ontario region abundant in critical minerals. But the region is also home to peatlands that store an estimated 35 billion tonnes of carbon.

Fast-tracking projects: The Ring of Fire is a “challenging space,” senior Ottawa officials acknowledge, while Environment Minister Steven Steven Guilbeault believes the exclusion of Indigenous groups in projects has delayed projects. Ottawa is also expected to unveil a plan by the year-end to streamline permitting for mining projects, while there is a push to establish a national Indigenous loan guarantee program.

Mineral investment magnet: While the Ring of Fire has been in a regulatory bog, Canadian miners have been on the move elsewhere. Canada led the world (along with Australia) in minerals’ exploration with over 40% year-on-year growth in 2022, especially in lithium and nickel plays, according to the International Energy Agency. A third of all new cobalt refining projects is planned in Canada, while General Motors, BASF, POSCO and Vale are eyeing development of a battery hub in Bécancour, Quebec, including raw materials, cathode and recycling operations. But there’s a need to move faster as metals scarcity and geopolitics could impede energy transition.

Alternative to China: Canada has struck a slew of deals with the U.S., EU, the U.K., Japan and others to leverage its critical mineral abundance and reduce Western dependence on China. Now we need to boost critical mineral production. Case in point: Beijing’s recent export curbs on gallium and germanium metals had the West scurrying for the commodities used in solar parts. Luckily, Canada’s Teck Resources is a major producer of germanium, while both metals feature in The Canadian Critical Minerals Strategy.

PUBLIC POLICY

The Inflation Reduction Act is the 900-pound green beast that looms over discussions between energy corporations with officials in Ottawa and provincial capitals these days.

For good reason. While Canada can compete for wind and solar power investment with U.S. incentives turbocharged by its climate bill, it is struggling to remain competitive in other low-carbon technologies, according to a new report by Clean Prosperity and The Transition Accelerator.

How can Canada keep up? The analysts have two recommendations:

#1. Companies are concerned Canadian climate policies don’t lend themselves to cashflow certainty for projects. Time is running out as many companies are making investment decisions now to meet 2030 goals. Ottawa should quickly introduce long-term contracts for difference (CCfDs) to bring market certainty. #2. Canada will struggle to compete with U.S. firepower, but it can focus on strategic sectors such as hydrogen, biofuels and CCS, and leverage its policy tools such as carbon pricing mechanisms, tax credits, and direct financing tools like loans and CCfDs to create a formidable package.

It echoes a recent report by RBC Climate Action Institute, which recommended Canada play to its advantage by doubling down on key strategic sectors and treat IRA as a climate enabler, not a competitor.

ZEROING IN

Barbie, a flick about the coming of age of the world’s most famous doll, hits the screens this week, and it got us thinking about plastic toys. They can go quickly go from joyful to junk, as children tire of them within a few years (weeks, even), but Barbies, Kens and other polymer playthings can hang around in landfills and at the bottom of seas for long periods of time—1,300 years in some cases. Here’s the scale of the challenge:

Source: UN Environment Program, Bloomberg, U.S. Environment Protection Agency, Report by Sarah Levesque, Madeline Robertson, Christie Klimas.

Indigenous LNG Trio, Ontario’s Grid Greenprint, Climate Carrots

Climate In Action

“All sticks and no carrot.”: That was Alberta Premier Danielle Smith pithy assessment of the spate of Ottawa’s climate policies being rolled out. Several premiers echoed that sentiment at their annual summit, concerned that federal climate policies are hurting growth. Ottawa countered that low-carbon economy will spark innovation.

#Restorenature: That was activist Greta Thunberg’s hashtag to push European Parliament members to vote for a strengthened Nature Restoration Law. The parliament’s biggest party opposed the deal over concerns about price hikes for consumers and impact on farmers and food industries. But the law was passed, albeit with a razor-thin margin.

A Canadian lake marks the beginning of a new geological age. Human-driven climate change and biodiversity loss are among reasons some scientists believe we are now in the Anthropocene era. The new age even has an epicentre: Thanks to its unique characteristics, Crawford Lake, 60 kilometres west of Toronto, was picked by scientists as the location that best records the dawn of the human epoch.

CHART OF THE WEEK

With clouds lifting over the Stellantis-LG deal, Canada has a strong foothold in the emerging EV supply-chain space. Ottawa is eyeing a couple more projects of similar scale, “but that’s going to be it, because that’s what Canada can afford,” according to François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry of Canada, in what seems like a slightly underwhelming tone. Where’s the ambition?

Here’s what Canada has attracted so far:

INDIGENOUS

Add uranium to the list of minerals facing critical shortages.

A trio of powerful Indigenous women are making a compelling sales pitch to Canada: a liquefied natural gas industry in the hands of First Nations means strong environmental discipline. Crystal Smith of Haisla Nation, Eva Clayton of Nisga’a Lisims, and Karen Ogen, of First Nations LNG Alliance, were out in force this week to make the case for West Coast LNG export projects as the global LNG industry met in Vancouver.

Gas’s tricky role: Gas has emerged as a vital but contentious energy source post-Ukraine. Backers say swapping coal with natural gas can rapidly cut fast-growing Asia’s emissions; skeptics argue continued dependence on natural gas delays the switch to zero-emission energy sources.

Indigenous pitch: Cedar LNG, backed by Haisla Nation and midstream company Pembina, has already secured environmental approvals and is eyeing a final investment decision by the fourth quarter of 2023. Woodfibre LNG, a smaller project by Pacific Energy Corp. and Enbridge, signed an Impact Benefit Agreement with the Squamish Nation, while Nisga’a Nation and a group of Calgary-based oil and gas producers are behind the massive Ksi Lisims LNG project.

Licence to export?: Indigenous backing gives LNG so-called social licence (although not all Indigenous groups back the projects), but several questions on environmental impact remain unanswered before an export license can be issued. Pembina Institute’s modelling shows the development of Shell-backed LNG Canada Phase 1 and Woodfibre means emissions from the sector will blow past the province’s 2030 sectoral targets. If Cedar and Ksi Lisims also proceed, total emissions could triple from targets.

Article 6: A Paris Accord clause that allows jurisdictions—at least in theory— to receive credit for reducing emissions in other countries was a topic of discussion between Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and PM Justin Trudeau on the sidelines of the Calgary Stampede. But Article 6 is far from the finished, umm, article, with consumers reluctant to transfer hard-earned emissions cuts to producers. An RBC Climate Action Institute report in April on Canada’s LNG conundrum showed global net emissions could decline 105 MtCO2e if Canada’s LNG displaces Asian coal consumption, although Canadian emissions would rise 16.6 MtCO2e.

ENERGY

Ontario’s clean grid strategy, released this week, has the “all-of-the-above” vibe to it.

The province is doubling down on its nuclear power prowess, keeping natural gas in play and eyeing more hydro even as it plugs in more solar and wind into the grid.

There’s a lot to like in the provincial government’s plan to meet rising long-term electricity needs. The plan to invest more in nuclear will add certainty that Ontario’s electricity grid would facilitate Net Zero goals by 2050. But its reliance on natural gas in the near term could threaten short-term climate targets.

Ontario’s “Plan For A Clean Energy Future” signals the government’s recognition that the province’s economic growth depends on more clean electricity: a greener grid would help the province attract billions of dollars in transition energy investments such as electric vehicle supply chains, decarbonizing industries, energy storage, and critical minerals.

But the plan falls somewhat short in putting much of the focus on the 2040s. The province’s decision to maintain natural gas-fired power in the energy mix could set up a potential political dust-up with the federal government, which is poised to finalize its Clean Electricity Regulations.

Read RCAI senior economist Colin Guldimann’s analysis here.

ZEROING IN

Steel would be the third biggest CO2 emitter in the world after China and the United States if it were a country, accounting for 7-9% of global emissions . The industry is also the poster child of “hard-to-abate” sectors, given the carbon-intensive process involved. But Luxembourg-based steel giant Arcelor Mittal is giving it a shot with a strategic investment in Ontario-based Char Technologies. It’s a start:

Uranium Shortages, Atlantic Loop, Canada Vs IRA

Climate In Action

CHART OF THE WEEK

Investments of US$3-5 trillion annually are needed globally to reach Net Zero by 2050. Canada has had an early lead as a climate tech leader (see table below), but BCG Consulting estimates we need 6-9 times increase in climate-focused investment to reach our own climate goals and remain ahead of competitors.

ENERGY

Add uranium to the list of minerals facing critical shortages.

Nuclear is on the cusp of a renaissance as it gains acceptance as a bona fide member of clean energy sources that will power us to Net Zero by 2050. The energy source received yet another boost this week, with Ontario eyeing a new, 4.8 -gigawatt nuclear power plant at the Bruce Nuclear Generating Station site—the province’s first large-scale nuclear project in 30 years. If the expansion proceeds, the site would generate 11GW—surpassing Japan’s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant, currently the world’s largest nuclear facility. The province is also developing Canada’s first grid-scale small modular reactor (SMR) at Ontario Power Generation’s Darlington nuclear site.

The resurgence means the global nuclear industry must work through several bottlenecks, notably securing enough uranium to fuel nuclear reactors, in order to capture its renewed promise.

Yes, a renaissance!: Countries are extending the life of their nuclear power plants, while at least 60 new reactors are under construction. Some forecasters are predicting average annual deficit of 40 million pounds per annum for the next decade. The International Energy Agency expects nuclear power to grow 43% to 590 GWe by 2050, with 30 additional countries looking to start nuclear power programs.

Radioactive Russia: Unrest in the Central Asian state of Kazakhstan, which produces 40% of the world’s uranium, raised concerns over the past few years. Then Russia, another major producer, made its move on Ukraine, which has made Russian exports unwelcome in certain quarters. The global nuclear industry is heavily reliant on Russian supplies, which accounts for 14% of uranium concentrates, 27% of conversion and 39% of enrichment. Nearly 80% of primary production is in the hands of state-owned enterprises, setting up an energy security challenge.

Nuclear waste: A regulator-approved plan by Japan to release more than a million tons of treated nuclear waste water from the destroyed Fukushima power plant in the ocean has also highlighted the challenge of nuclear waste—something the industry would have to address as nuclear regains popularity.

Canadian context: Uranium prices have been creeping up, but producers remain wary after a prolonged price slump. Home to the world’s third largest uranium reserves, Canada was once one of the largest uranium producers in the world until it was overtaken by Kazakhstan. Around 40 companies are exploring for new prospects in Canada, but Nova Scotia, Quebec and British Columbia have banned uranium mining and exploration. Interest in small modular reactors in Ontario and elsewhere is expected to raise demand for uranium, while the Feds are helping with nuclear among the energy sources eligible for an investment tax credit for clean electricity. Is it time for Canadian provinces to re-assess their position on uranium?

PUBLIC POLICY

How important is the Atlantic Loop to Nova Scotia’s climate goals? The province is eyeing an 80% Net Zero grid by 2030—an ambitious target as coal powers just over half of the province’s grid, making Nova Scotia’s grid the most coal-dependent in the country.

Media report suggests the Atlantic Loop—an ambitious plan to plug fossil-fuel dependent Maritime provinces with hydropower from Newfoundland & Labrador and Quebec—is imminent. Provinces and utilities are negotiating with Ottawa, which has offered to invest $4.5 billion to support the project. It’s not enough, says Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston who believes the project could bankrupt the province. Houston’s government outlined a plan that shows the province can meet its 2030 electricity target, with or without the Atlantic Loop.

The Atlantic Loop is a microcosm of the challenge of building major energy infrastructure projects in the country. But a deal on the project could prove to be a win for Canada as: (1) provinces leverage their resources to collaborate with neighbours, (2) a major energy project proceeds in Canada, (3) Nova Scotia goes a long way in getting off coal, and (4) transmission lines are built across provinces—a rarity in the country.

ZEROING IN

Swapping smokestack with fuel cell stacks, North America’s first hydrogen-powered train is taking riders on an emissions-free trip around central Quebec. Beyond the commercial service demonstration, the big win would be to shift freight from diesel and gasoline-powered trucks to hydrogen-run trains at a mass scale, leading to lower road congestion and emissions.

Climate-Proofing Canada, Alberta’s Moonshot & Looming Copper Crisis

PUBLIC POLICY

With much of the country blanketed in wildfire haze, Canada rolled out its National Adaptation Strategy this week. The initiative to protect the country from the ravages of climate change covers a lot of ground: coastlines, disaster resilience, health and well-being, biodiversity, infrastructure, the economy, and workers.

It’s also necessary. The 2019 heat wave in British Columbia led to 619 deaths, while the bill to combat wildfires has averaged $1 billion annually (the current wildfire season, said to be the worst on record, is estimated to have cost Ontario nearly $1.3 billion alone, and counting). By 2025, Canada could suffer climate losses of $25 billion annually, equal to half of projected GDP growth, the government estimates.

Forestry, agriculture, fisheries, energy, mining, transportation, and tourism are at highest risk, while repairs after floods and wildfires is already costing each Canadian $720 a year, the Canadian Climate Institute estimates. In contrast: $1 spent on adaptation measures could result in as much as $15 in total benefits.

Some key NAS goalposts:

The plan has earmarked around $2 billion to implement the strategy:

Further Reading: Power Shift: How Ontario Can Cut Its $450-Billion Electricity Bill

Canada’s $40 Billion Net Zero Building Challenge

PUBLIC POLICY

Climate change presents Canada its greatest technological challenge—and economic opportunity. And Alberta needs to play a leading role in the energy transition, not because this is where the energy transition risks are concentrated, but because it’s where the opportunities are.

We explore five opportunities Alberta can lean into:

Opportunity #1: Buildings Revolution Rapid population growth means we need six million new homes In Canada by 2030. Alberta is the perfect place to launch Canada’s buildings revolution, as it has the materials, science labs, a deep history in construction, deep pools of capital, newer building stock and a young, growing population.

Opportunity #2: Soil Capture Many grain growers in Western Canada are already net-negative in terms of emissions, thanks to the rapid scaling of nutrient management, adoption of natural or planted windbreaks and other climate smart techniques. In a province of annual plantings, there’s a further opportunity to strategically plant crops that boost the province’s ability to store carbon. The potential soil capture prize for Alberta could be $1.2 billion annually by 2050.

Opportunity #3: Anaerobic digester Across Canada, farmers are exploring the use of biodigesters as an additional source of revenue and reduce emissions from livestock. Anaerobic digestors will play a key role in sequestering carbon and creating new revenues for producers in the province.

Opportunity #4: Hydrogen Industrial hydrogen powerhouse Alberta can lead in a potentially $2.5 trillion global market, especially as it rolls out its Hydrogen Roadmap and Edmonton’s Hydrogen Hub. While Canada’s allies are reaching out to us as a potential source, we need to assure them that our policies won’t constantly change, and that our infrastructure is robust, resilient and reliable.

Opportunity #5: Carbon Capture and Storage Carbon capture and storage is Canada’s moonshot—an engineering project that should galvanize a nation. Alberta’s Carbon Trunk Line may not have the same ring to it as, say, Apollo 13, but it can carry the same weight in terms of nation-building and demonstrating a technology at scale that can help other sectors and that we can sell to the world.

–Excerpt from a speech by John Stackhouse, RBC Senior Vice-President, to the Business Council of Alberta in June.

INDIGENOUS

The 2023 federal budget proposed several initiatives that are necessary to build a thriving, sustainable clean economy in Canada. One of its most meaningful is to improve the quality and consistency of benefits that Indigenous communities derive from major green projects in their territories, especially as the government pursues its Critical Minerals Strategy.

In Nation Building: Unlocking Indigenous Potential To Power Canada’s Net Zero Economy, Allan Clarke, an Indigenous consultant who once served as Director General, Economic Research and Policy Development with the former Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada, explores ways to further unlock capital for First Nations participation in the clean economy, including:

Read Allan Clarke’s Essay for the RBC Climate Action Institute: Nation Building: Unlocking Indigenous Potential To Power Canada’s Net Zero Economy

ZEROING IN

The lungs of the world needs a breath of fresh air. The Amazon rainforest, which produces 20% of the world’s oxygen, is facing rapid deforestation with Brazil losing tree cover the size of Belgium every year. A new World Resource Institute report outlines a plan to halt deforestation and build an Amazon bioeconomy, using renewable biological resources sustainably to produce food, energy and industrial goods.

Here’s how Brazil can sow the seeds of a sustainable economy:

Source: New Economy for the Brazilian Amazon

CANADA Vs WORLD

Industry executives are warning of a coper “train wreck” as supply stalls of a critical metal. Copper is a prized metal used in many industrial processes and green technology including renewable energy generation and electric vehicles. RBC Capital Markets expects copper demand to rise 2.8% annually until 2035 as electrification gains momentum (from 2.5% previously). Constrained supply, however, could trigger higher prices that could lead to demand for copper substitutes such as aluminum and plastics.

Primary copper supply deficit may hit 32 million tons in 2050 and new mines and recycling will be needed to meet demand, according to BloombergNEF. Can Canada help?

Currently, Canada is the world’s 11th largest producer of copper and 13th largest in terms of reserves. While the country’s copper production has declined 2% annually over the past five years, it could rise 3% annually over the next three, according to one estimate, with 10 copper projects planned or underway.

Chile, Peru, Russia and Democratic Republic of Congo are among the countries expected to drive just over 50% of production growth. But with all of them facing their own set of unique political and economic challenges, can Canada’s Critical Minerals Strategy and Critical Mineral Exploration Tax Credit help boost the country’s copper output?

How To Decarbonize Canada, Arrested Project Development and Fast Fashion

Public Policy

Here’s what Canada could look like in 2050: Falling oil and gas production, surging electricity demand that generates net-negative emissions, and electric vehicles dominating the highways. That’s a scenario where Canada achieves Net Zero by 2050 even if the rest of the world struggles to cut its emissions, according to the Canada Energy Regulator’s latest biennial forecast.

The CER also paints a picture for two other scenarios: Global Net Zero, where the world’s emissions fall in tandem with Canadian GHGs, and a Current Measures scenario, which effectively suggests that policy measures to date will fall short of our 2050 targets.

A Net Zero world that shuns conventional energy will also require steely resolve in the face of economic growth uncertainty, rising consumer prices, and a slightly unfavourable Canada-U.S. exchange rate.

The report is not meant to be a prediction or recommendation but explores how possible energy futures might unfold for the Canadian economy:

Oil: Mentioned 316 times in the report. Exports (2022, $): $156.6 billion Canadian oil production declines in two out of three scenarios (see table above). Carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) plays a role with the technology’s capacity in the oilsands peaking at 27 MT in 2033 in the Global NZ Scenario (and 49 MT in 2035 in the Canada NZ Scenario). Still, most oil facilities are expected to shut down with only the most efficient projects in operation by 2050 in a decarbonizing world.

Natural Gas: 345 mentions. Exports (2022, $): $24.6 billion A CCUS-fitted energy source has a role to play—if diminishing—in a Net Zero world. LNG Canada and Woodfibre LNG on the West Coast are set to be the two main liquefied natural gas export projects in a decarbonizing world, but there is room for more exports (think LNG Canada Phase II) if the world is struggling to rein in emissions.

Electricity: 342 mentions. Exports (2022, $): $5.7 billion Electricity is the new star of the Canadian energy complex, accounting for 41% of energy use by 2050 (from 17% today). Decarbonized by 2035, low-carbon electricity will power transportation, heavy industries, and homes. Wind, nuclear power, hydro, natural gas with CCUS, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), and solar making up most of the new generation growth over the projection period. Net electricity exports to the U.S. will fall modestly in both NZ scenarios.

Hydrogen: 257 mentions. Exports (2022, $): $0.7 billion Hydrogen gets its own chapter in the report. Canada could export around 4.5 MT to 5 MT of low-carbon hydrogen, produced from natural gas+CCUS, electrolysis and biomass gasification in the two Net Zero scenarios.

Other notable mentions: Wind (47 times), solar (31), nuclear (29), hydroelectricity (5).

ELECTRICITY

Ontario faces a $450-billion investment bill by 2050 to meet surging demand and emerge as a green-grid hub that’s attractive to industries aiming to lower their emissions. But rising electricity demand could strain the province’s grid as early as 2026 and even trigger chronic shortages by 2030.

Ontario is eyeing more gas-fired power generation to meet its pressing needs, but unabated natural gas plants could clash with the federal government’s forthcoming Clean Electricity Regulations.

Power Shift: How Ontario Can Cut Its $450-Billion Electricity Bill, a new RBC Climate Action Institute report, explores how the province can avoid making hasty and expensive decisions on its future energy mix.

Deploying technology such as smart thermostats and AI-enabled HVAC systems, and timely action to conserve energy could save enough electricity to power 3 million homes by early 2040s—a little more than half of the province’s residential electricity demand.

Deferring hefty financial commitments will keep electricity affordable and give Ontario time to redefine itself as a low-carbon manufacturing hub that attracts companies involved in electric car supply chains, green metal production, and clean-tech. Read Power Shift: How Ontario Can Cut Its $450-Billion Electricity Bill

Public Policy

Can Canada and the world’s energy infrastructure withstand the changes brought about by climate change and energy transition in the next 25 years? Here’s the scale of the challenge:

It’s going to be monumentally hard, though not impossible. To capture the opportunity, Canada needs to make some strategic choices. Here are five to consider:

1. Fiscal support. The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act is a game-changer. Ottawa’s latest budget went a good way toward matching it, with the clean electricity investment tax credit, and making it available to non-tax paying entities was essential.

2. Regulatory flexibility. This will likely come to a head this summer with the Clean Electricity Regulations, which is contentious with political support waning. There is clearly a risk to locking in gas production for a long time, but we need to be mindful that long-term climate ambitions can undermine short-term realities, which could also derail those climate ambitions.

3. Capital incentives. The Infrastructure Bank, and the new Growth Fund will need to play a frontline role with “contracts for difference” — essentially carbon price guarantees — to reduce the long-term political risk of transition projects.

4. Indigenous inclusion. We need to ensure the tools are there for Indigenous communities to fully participate in the transition. One critical option: a national loan guarantee to help backstop Indigenous equity ownership in projects, modelled after similar programs in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario.

5. Consumer technology. As we wrote in Power Shift, a recent report that examined Ontario’s grid challenge, nearly 20% of the province’s expected demand could be met through conservation, including AI-enabled HVACs and smart thermostats.

These levers show that we have choice — but not for as long as we might like.

–Excerpts from a speech by John Stackhouse, RBC Senior Vice-President, at the Electricity Canada Policy Symposium in Winnipeg in June

ZEROING IN

“Fast fashion” may need to slow down. Inexpensive clothes that capture a fleeting viral trend have severe climate consequences, according to a new report. Here’s why the current clothing system is not working:

Source: Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Fashion and the circular economy (ellenmacarthurfoundation.org)

Capital

Resource companies can line up funding, pick a location and plan out project feasibility relatively quickly in Canada. But then comes the dreaded assessment phase—a process that can last years and crush even the most feasible project under the weight of the scrutiny.

The Business Council of Alberta recently identified nine challenges in the concept-to completion regulatory process that need to be addressed. We capture a few of the key hurdles the BCA identified in its report:

Challenge 1: Expectations around Indigenous engagement are unclear and capacity improvements are needed. Recommendation: Establish an independent, centralized Indigenous Consultation Office that liaises with communities and government agencies and conducts nation-to-nation consultation.

Challenge 2: Third-party interventions can be repetitive or not pertinent. Recommendation: Agencies should proactively scope and assess third-party intervenor engagement activities/submissions alongside the proponent to answer inquiries into standard or repetitive issues of concern.

Challenge 3: Federal internal coordination is inefficient. Recommendation: Ensure lead agencies (such as Canada Energy Regulator) don’t cede control to non-lead departments involved in the process. Lead agencies should place limits on, and establish strict timelines for, other departments or agencies’ involvement in reviews.

Challenge 4: Project review timelines are long, expanding, and not proportional to project risk. Recommendation: Categorize projects based on complexity, with review of more complex projects capped at 15 months.

Challenge 5: Political and policy preferences are creating uncertain processes. Recommendation: Make policy environment predictable and stop adding and layering new regulations on top of existing ones. Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) should draft clear, logical, and predictable guidelines for projects.

Challenge 6: Construction windows are too easily disrupted, and permits are often required from all three levels of government. Recommendation: A co-ordination body will avoid duplication and obstruction from other jurisdictions.

Read BCA’s Recommendations: Future Unbuilt Task Force Paper

Wildfires’ Carbon Consequences, Great Arctic Resource Hunt, Ozanada

CLIMATE

Canada is in the throes of what’s being called its “worst wildfire season of the 21st century.” The blazes have spread across nine Canadian provinces and territories, burning through 47,000 square kilometres to date—that’s roughly seven times the size of the Greater Toronto Area.

The wildfires also have severe emissions consequences.

Alberta’s forest fires this year alone have spewed 17 megatonnes of carbon emissions (a fifth of the oilsands’ annual emissions), according to Copernicus, the European Union’s Earth Observation Programme. That’s the highest emissions level seen in the province since the 2019 fires when 8,000 square kilometres burned. “Carbon emissions for Saskatchewan, British Columbia, Ontario, Northwest Territories and Nova Scotia are also already at record or near-record levels,” Copernicus wrote in an early June report.

CO2 emissions from North America and Eurasia’s boreal forest fires have surged since 2000, touching a new high in 2021, according to a group of researchers writing for Science magazine. Typically, boreal fires account for 10% of global CO2 emissions from wildfires (tropical forests usually generate far more emissions), but in 2021 they produced nearly a quarter of the total.

“This abnormally high total resulted from the concurrence of water deficits in North America and Eurasia, which was an unusual situation,” the researchers said. “The increasing number of extreme wildfires that is accompanying global warming presents a real challenge to global climate change mitigation efforts.”

Indeed, persistent drought conditions has left Canada’s landscapes vulnerable to wildfires, with around 47% of the country classified as “abnormally dry” or in moderate to extreme drought, including 70% of the country’s agriculture landscape in May, according to Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

While analysts quibble over the wildfires’ direct links to climate change, the International Panel For Climate Change says overshooting 1.5°C will certainly lead to more severe weather events including more wildfires.

Apart from disrupting the economy, wildfires lead to higher carbon monoxide exposure, particle exposure, impact on biodiversity and habitat (especially during nesting season), with prolonged exposure leading to health complications.

Insurance claims related to weather have routinely averaged above $2 billion annually in the country in recent years, according to the Insurance Bureau of Canada. Meanwhile, two major insurers have stopped offering property and casualty coverage to new customers in California, citing the frequency of natural disasters in that state.

Ensuring climate resiliency of cities, and infrastructure is fast emerging as a new, and costly, headache for policymakers at all levels. The National Research Council has already started work on building climate resilient homes and infrastructure.

ENERGY

As global warming melts the Arctic, paradoxically many states that lay claim to part of the North Pole are eyeing its hidden riches.

The Arctic plays a critical role in regulating global temperatures, with permafrost and sea ice vital vaults for storing carbon, while its rapid warming is also a barometer on the speed of climate change. The shrinking sea ice (by as much as 12.6% per decade) has led to a flurry of activities in the Arctic, tempting countries to exploit the estimated 30% of the world’s undiscovered gas and 13% of undiscovered oil that is buried beneath the permafrost.

Canada has been protective of the North, extending a ban on offshore oil and gas drilling in the region earlier this year.

But other allies, notably Norway and the U.S., have been casting around for riches in the thawing seas:

Given the abundance of oil and gas resources elsewhere in the country, Canada has chosen not to pursue oil and gas drilling in the Arctic core. But as Ottawa remains concerned about Russia and China’s ambitions in the Arctic, a sharper northern strategy is going to be critical for Canada’s local communities and national security.

TRANSPORTATION

Fuel extracted from cooking oil and food scraps could soon be powering airplanes. It’s not a flight of fancy, either. RBC Capital Markets expects sustainable aviation fuels, or SAF, to emerge as a US$100-billion market by the end of the decade.

What’s SAF, again?: The fuel is produced from sustainable, renewable feedstocks such as cooking oils, packaging, textiles and food scraps. Switching from conventional jet fuel to SAF can cut emissions by up to 80%, according to industry estimates. With aviation accounting for 3% of global energy-related CO2 emissions, SAF could play a key role in delivering global Net Zero targets.

What policy measures are driving the segment?: The European Union’s RefuelEU has progressive blending mandates to boost adoption, while the U.S.’s Sustainable Aviation Fuel Grand Challenge is offering tax credits to raise SAF consumption to at least 3 billion gallons per annum in 2030. Airbus and Boeing have also committed to 100% SAF capability for commercial and military aircraft by 2030.

What’s been the Canadian response?: The Canadian Council for Sustainable Aviation Fuels, featuring 60 airlines operating in the country, recently set out domestic SAF consumption target of 1 billion litre (264 million gallons) by 2030, or 10% of the country’s jet fuel demand.

Are there alternatives to SAF?: SAF faces competition from sun-to-liquid, power-to-liquid (using hydrogen) , and electrically-powered aircraft, but the industry believes an electric or hydrogen engine for jumbo-sized aircraft remain a long way off.

Headwinds for SAF?: SAF capacity could range from 20 metric tonnes to 60 metric tonnes, RBC Capital Markets estimates, taking supply levels potentially above demand at 24 metric tonnes by 2030. However, “we see potential risks in completing projects and delivering volumes,” RBCCM notes, as many producers signing offtake deal have relatively little experience in the biofuel space. Another challenge: It’s not easy for some in the industry to gain access to feedstock.

CANADA VS THE WORLD

Canada and Australia are often grouped together as twins separated at birth (with The Economist recently coining the hideous portmanteau “Ozanada”), but MIT begs to differ.

The U.S. university’s latest 76-country Green Future Index considers Canada a “green leader” with a respectable 14th ranking overall (6th among G20, excluding the European Union), while Australia is labelled a “climate laggard” with a 42nd placing (12th among G20). Canada, which climbed a spot from last year, fared especially well on climate policy with MIT identifying the 2030 Emissions Reduction Plan as a key policy lever.

The MIT ranking is in contrast to BloombergNEF’s latest G-20 Zero-Carbon Policy Scorecard, which placed Canada as 8th among G20 nations, behind the U.S.

A Middling Green G20: Only seven of the 19 G20 members were in MIT’s “Green Leaders” group. South Africa, China, Japan and Brazil were in the “Greening Middle,” for making some progress on building a green future. Australia, Argentina, Indonesia, India were in the “Climate Laggards” camp, suggesting slow climate progress, while Russia and Turkey were firmly in the “Climate Abstainers” group.

Renewable laggard: BloombergNEF’s report praised Canada’s Clean Fuels Regulations, carbon capture tax credit and a scheme to increase energy efficiency in buildings, but Canada still dropped two places from last year on the slowest growth among G20 in renewable energy capacity and domestic funding for fossil fuels.

Further Reading:

The Green Future Index 2023 | MIT Technology Review BNEF’s G-20 ZeroCarbon Policy Scoreboard

ZEROING IN

Canada’s Indigenous groups hold the key to unlocking the country’s resources. Their proximity to hundreds of energy and mining projects, and insights on sustainable practices make them a key partner in accelerating Canada’s new-energy economy and help the country achieve economic reconciliation.

As Canada celebrates National Indigenous History Month, we look at why Canada’s next resource boom must include Indigenous consent and collaboration:

Source: RBC Climate Action Institute/Statistics Canada

Further Reading: 92 To Zero: How Economic Reconciliation Can Power Canada’s Climate Goals

Power Anxiety, Aramco & Co’s Footprint & G20 Emissions

PUBLIC POLICY

The Prairie provinces are feeling anxious over Ottawa’s impending Clean Electricity Regulations, with premiers of both Alberta and Saskatchewan raising questions about the CER’s merits and impact on power bills.

So, what does the CER aims to accomplish and why are some provinces so concerned?

The CER is a signature federal climate proposal aimed at achieving Net Zero electricity sector by 2035. Despite provincial deviations, Canada already boasts a low-carbon grid with 82% of power generated by either hydro, nuclear, wind and solar—among the cleanest in the world. But rising electricity demand and population growth means maintaining lower carbon source in its energy mix will be a challenge going forward.

Enter the CER, which aims to strike a balance between managing GHG emission reduction, reliability and affordability.

The role natural gas will play in the reimagined energy grid is among the thorniest issues: heavy investments in long-lived natural gas projects would lock in emissions and clash with Canada’s Net Zero aspirations. Gas’s reliability and affordability makes it a compelling proposition, especially in the Prairies where phasing out coal is already leading to significant baseload shortfalls that will be challenging and expensive to plug with renewables alone. SaskPower, for example, says it will need natural gas or nuclear to ensure grid reliability.

The federal government, for its part, suggests Budget 2023’s major clean electricity subsidies that will see Ottawa picking up part of the tab for a Net Zero grid, should be incentive enough.

CER could emerge as a source of debate between federal government and provinces soon. Here are some key themes to look for: 1. Urgency: In terms of infrastructure planning, 2035 is just round the corner, with many nuclear and hydro projects requiring long lead times. Federal and provincial policymakers must agree quickly and provide investors regulatory certainty before they can move ahead with projects.

2. Questions around gas. CER aims to address the role of natural gas to maintain reliability in extreme weather, emergencies, or other Black Swan events. Ottawa’s investment tax credit for clean electricity (focused primarily on wind, solar photovoltaic and hydro etc.), also makes room for abated natural gas-fired electricity generation (which would be subject to an emissions intensity threshold compatible with a Net-Zero grid by 2035). 3. New technologies. Is CER an opportunity for hydrogen and small modular reactors to shine? In recent years, Ottawa has laid out a Small Modular Reactor (SMR) Action Plan and a Hydrogen Strategy over the past few years, but both promising technologies would require some bold—and quick—decision-making.

As RBC wrote in Price of Power, Canada needs to move quickly to address a potential 50% jump in electricity demand over the next decade. Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan are faced with especially urgent challenges, but each province has to choose its own path—and quickly.

CAPITAL

Are Saudi Aramco and other state-owned oil companies about to face a US$550-billion climate reckoning?

Global oil production is shifting away from publicly-listed Western companies to national oil companies in emerging markets, with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), expected to secure a greater market share of (albeit falling) global oil production over the next few decades.

Which raises the question: How ESG compliant are national oil companies (NOC) such as Saudi Aramco or Russia’s Rosneft? Most NOCs tied to OPEC countries have escaped deep environmental, social and governance scrutiny, as most are either not listed on international equity markets or listed on domestic markets with their primary shareholder—their government—still calling the shots.

But NOCs and their governments are major debt issuers and that’s catching the eye of institutional bond holders.

The face value of foreign bonds issued by NOCs stood at around US$550 billion as of March 2023, of which 40% outstanding bond debt matures in 2030 or beyond, according to a recent Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia report.

That leverage could potentially allow international bond investors to pressure NOCs and their governments to develop a more robust ESG framework, and bring them on a level playing field with Western counterparts.

“Failure of NOCs to address ESG risks could lead ESG-conscious investors to hold less bond debt from fossil fuel companies in general, which could impact NOCs’ ability to refinance or contract new debt in the future, or could increase their cost of financing,” according to the research.

The report identified Mexico’s Pemex, India’s Oil & Natural Gas Corp., China’s PetroChina and CNOOC Ltd and Aramco at the bottom in ESG performance (based on a combination of lists from rating agencies and other institutions).

Rating agencies are currently focused on the NOCs’ financial metrics (which remain solid with oil prices north of US$70 per barrel), rather than their climate and governance frameworks. But Russia’s attack on Ukraine has added a new dimension, with governance—the G in ESG—coming to the fore.

AGRICULTURE

Canada’s 243,000 kilometres of coastline—the longest in the world—can emerge as a key weapon in the fight against climate change. But it remains largely untapped, according to The Tide Is High, a new RBC Climate Action Institute report.

The ocean’s power to sequester carbon—pushing us closer to our climate targets—is unmatched by any other sector. It absorbs 31% of global CO2 emissions, capturing and storing “blue carbon” through a variety of processes involving mangroves, seagrass (known as eelgrass in Canada) and salt marshes.

And the financial toll of ignoring it is growing as more nations take on the challenge of mapping their seabeds and developing nascent blue carbon markets. Blue carbon credits are worth two to three times more than typical carbon credits—largely because of significantly higher sequestration potential and additional ecosystem services. Early estimates suggest Canada’s “blue carbon” represents an $3.5 billion market opportunity.

The report explores three key steps Canada can take to tap this greenfield opportunity. Read the report here.

CANADA Vs THE WORLD

Among G20 members, featuring 19 of the world’s richest countries (plus the European Union), Canada is the world’s ninth largest national economy, smack-in-the-middle 10th in terms of total emissions by country, and the third largest greenhouse gas emissions footprint in per capita terms.

None of these are perfect measures (due to the distinct strengths of various economies, population sizes and economic maturity etc.), but it underscores the work Canada needs to do to lower emissions.

Emerging Emissions: Emerging economies such as China, South Korea, India, Brazil, Mexico and Indonesia have seen steep emission hikes over the past two decades. These countries are also key global economic growth drivers, which makes their climate policies very consequential going forward.

Mature and slowing: For all its vacillations on climate issues, the U.S. has managed to lower its GHG footprint. Germany, the U.K., France and Italy, all mature economies that Canada is often bracketed with, have also managed to lower their emissions over the past two decades. Apart from Canada, Australia and Japan are the two other developed economies with still-rising emissions.

ZEROING IN

With an expected global investment of US$1 billion-plus a day in 2023, solar is set to eclipse annual investments in upstream oil for the first time ever, International Energy Agency forecasts.

Some of the dollars are trickling down to Canada with a Greek firm pouring $1.7 billion to build the country’s largest solar farm in Alberta. The company said it was drawn by Ottawa’s clean investment tax credits.

Here’s how solar has emerged as a new star in Canada’s energy mix:

Source: Canadian Renewable Energy Association

Danielle Smith’s Alberta, CEOs’ Top Concerns & Your Travel Emissions

PUBLIC POLICY

UCP’s election victory in Alberta gives Premier Danielle Smith the mandate to push made-in-Alberta climate and energy policies that may or may not always align with federal climates goals. In her victory speech, Smith identified “Ottawa’s de facto production cap” and the proposed Clean Electricity Regulations as federal policies she intends to resist. Still, with both levels of government eyeing Net Zero by 2050, there is room for compromise and collaboration.

Here are a handful of the UCP’s energy and climate related policies and ideas that could be consequential for Canada’s climate targets:

Alberta Job Growth & Diversification Strategy: Featured in the UCP platform, the plan aims to welcome companies from agriculture, aviation, energy and manufacturing. Alberta had some success attracting new energy startups, but could the new plan spark a bigger influx and accelerate diversification? A UCP pledge not to raise taxes could help the province win over investors exploring various jurisdictions.

Attracting skilled trades: A $1,200 non-refundable tax credit for workers in key areas including trades—vital for decarbonization efforts—could help address a chronic labour shortage.

Carbon capture incentives?: Will the provincial government now move ahead with decarbonization incentives for the six-company Pathways Alliance in its quest to achieve Net Zero in the oilsands by 2050? Smith had previously indicated she would consider it.

Alberta Emissions Reduction & Energy Development Plan: Currently short on details, the plan aims to achieve Net Zero by 2050. Pembina Institute suggests the province show its intent with a shorter-term plan to cut oilsands and methane emissions by 2030.

PROJECTS

Buried in the market-moving news of the White House and Republican leadership avoiding a catastrophic debt default, was a nugget crucial for U.S. energy transition: agreement on speeding up energy projects.

The 99-page agreement includes reforming the National Environmental Policy Act for the first time in nearly 40 years, and creating a “single lead agency ” that streamlines environmental reviews. Various U.S. government agencies must wrap up environmental

reviews in a year, while more complex projects will have a two-year timeframe. The deal is seen as a victory for the wider energy industry that has bemoaned the slow pace of permitting in the U.S., despite the roll out of the Inflation Reduction Act, the White House’s signature climate program.

Canadian CEOs are already anxious about the U.S. climate program and the permitting pace of various levels of Canadian governments. CEOs of around 45 low-carbon companies were in Ottawa this week to discuss regulatory reforms, industrial subsidies, and financing mechanisms, with government and opposition leaders.

Surveys over the past few weeks also suggest a mix of uncertainty and hope among Canadian C-suite on climate. Some highlights:

Should Canada follow the U.S. with a similar, one-window permitting agency?

Further reading:

TRANSPORTATION

Getting on a plane this summer? Some of us are conscious of the impact of our wanderlust on the environment.

Source: Choose

It’s true that aviation emissions are rising faster than from rail, road and shipping, while sustainable aviation fuels have yet to take flight in a major way.

While there is no reason to feel guilty for indulging in a bit of R&R in an exotic location, buying carbon offsets could be helpful. Canadian airlines offer options to buy carbon credits to offset the environmental cost of your travel. Just remember a few things:

1. It’s an imperfect solution. Buying carbon credits only allow you to balance your travel emissions by financing the planting of a few trees in, say, Ecuador—it’s not exactly like-for-like. Many would argue carbon-offsets are ineffective, but it’s far better than taking no action. It’s, of course, no substitute for policies aimed at decarbonizing industries.

2. Find a reputable provider. Some carbon offset programs are not as efficient at reducing greenhouse gas emissions as advertised. The Gold Standard, backed by the World Wildlife Fund and others, offers transparency with fully traceable projects, but there are plenty of other choices, too.

3. Climate justice. Every little action helps. Buying carbon credits for projects in low-income countries can contribute to climate justice—as these are often countries that are bearing the brunt of climate change but have negligible emissions of their own.

Still curious? The Disruptors podcast covered the topic last summer on the 10-Minute Take series, “Are Carbon Offsets Actually Effective?”

ZEROING IN

How much will Canada’s Clean Fuel Regulations (CFR) cost Canadians by 2030 when it kicks in on July 1? Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) found the new policy to be “broadly regressive.” Ottawa pushed back, calling the PBO report “skewed .” CFR aims to lower carbon intensity of gasoline and diesel by 15% by 2030 (vs 2016 levels). Premiers of Atlantic Canada provinces also want the Feds to delay the new regulations until a plan is in place to “address the disproportionate impact of the regulations on Atlantic Canadians.”

Here’s how the PBO sees CFR’s economic impact:

Source: Office Of The Parliamentary Budget Officer

AGRICULTURE

Canadian farmers are embracing renewable energy and new technologies to lower emissions while raising production.

Around 12% of Canadian farmers had integrated renewable energy on their farms in 2021, more than double the levels reported in 2015, Statistics Canada data shows. But is renewable energy uptake accelerating fast enough to cut agricultural emissions that currently account for 10% of Canada’s total GHG emissions? Easier said than done. Bringing cleaner power to farmlands is hard with many smaller farms grappling with the high costs of plugging into cleaner grids in remote locations.

Sunny ways: Solar emerged as the most popular renewable energy source, with a third of farmers in Ontario and a quarter in Alberta reportedly harnessing the power of the sun. While installing solar energy on a farm is expensive, potential long-term savings can help offset costs. One Canadian farmer RCAI spoke to had installed solar panels worth $300,000 with the expectation of getting his return on investments in seven years through energy savings. Wind energy is also gathering momentum on Canadian farmlands with Ontario accounting for more than half of all wind installations.

Tapping the underground. Geothermal, a primary source for heating greenhouses, soil and water for fish farming, was deployed by 1.9% of farms in Canada, with farmers in Manitoba (4.1%) and Ontario (3.5%) leading the way.

A slice of soil: Prince Edward Island and Quebec farmers were most inclined to do soil sample tests, but farmers in other provinces are also warming up to the practice. Soil sampling measures nutrients left in the field after a harvest help assess, and lead to more efficient yields.

More with less: Improving productivity on farms will also help Canada produce more with less energy. More than a quarter of farms reported using auto-steer in 2021 (versus one-fifth in 2015), which cuts seed and fertilizer wastage, while 20% had deployed robotic milkers (up from nearly 9% in 2015).

Red-Hot Cooling Market, Peak Plastic & G7 Clean-Energy Blueprint

ENERGY

Temperatures rising 1.5C persistently above pre-industrial levels will spark more intense wildfires, floods and extreme weather—and more demand for air conditioners, perhaps even mandated by law. As energy demand from air conditioning triples by 2050, the segment’s emissions could double in the absence of cleaner grids and efficient cooling technologies.

The Ontario Human Rights Commission is pushing for protection against heat for tenants in the province (currently air conditioning is not deemed a vital service in the Residential Tenancies Act). Already, around 64% of Canadian households had some type of air conditioning in 2021, compared to 55% in 2013 , and rising immigration levels and stickier weather could propel demand. It goes beyond discomfort: A heat dome in 2021 led to the deaths of 619 people, according to British Columbia’s Coroners Service.

Other parts of the world could see even more intense conditions, with populous South Asia expected to bear the brunt of climate change. The World Bank says “equitable cooling” will be vital as rising heat and humidity could risk up to 4.5%-5% of GDPs of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh—for a combined population of nearly 1.8 billion.

As temperatures—and incomes— rise in India, the International Energy Agency (IEA) expects the country’s cooling needs to exceed 1 billion units by 2050 from 67 million today. China’s A/C unit stock will nearly double to 1.4 billion.

A/Cs already account for nearly 4% of global greenhouse gas emissions. With many Asian nations still burning coal for electricity, the pivot to natural gas, nuclear and renewables will need to be accelerated to beat the heat and rein in global warming.

PUBLIC POLICY

Critical minerals are the new oil, and quickly reshaping America’s worldview—Canada better be prepared, says RBC senior vice-president John Stackhouse after a visit to Washington earlier this month. Here are his top 5 climate observations from the U.S. capital that has implications for Canada:

1. The great pivot. It’s becoming clear that Joe Biden wants his presidency to be defined by America’s ability to shift away from China. Some of that is rooted in his climate policies, and the Inflation Reduction Act’s gargantuan investments in hydrogen, carbon capture and electric vehicles. But a greater force at play is America’s security concerns that it’s become too dependent on China for everything.

2. More Arctic tensions. The U.S. is mapping out critical mineral opportunities in Alaska, while Russia is doing the same on the other side of the Arctic Sea. Canada will need to move fast to develop and export our share if we want to be part of the new U.S. green supply chain.

3. Renewed trade tensions. Don’t take for granted that the U.S. will renew the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement without a fight. Subsidies to encourage green growth could be an easy target, and even though Washington is doing the same, contradictions have never stood in the way of U.S. trade policies.

4. Energy security as national security. Who would have expected Joe Biden to be President Drillbit, but little matters more in Washington right now than oil and gas and their role in domestic inflation. Any overt move by Canada to curtail energy supplies could add to #3.

5. More demands for infrastructure. Biden’s efforts to re-shore manufacturing require massive investments in ports, roads and digital corridors, and Canada has a lot to offer, from our construction and engineering companies to institutional investors. This could be a moment to help our ally, while also helping ourselves.

ENERGY

Often the scale of the climate challenge—in tonnes of oil equivalent, parts per million, and kilojoules—is hard to get our heads around. Take the plastic industry, for example: 430 million metric tonnes is produced each year. It’s gobbledygook unless broken down in human terms: that’s around 50 kilograms for each of the 8 billion people on the planet, or the weight of two full suitcases airlines would allow (without charging extra fees).

The UN Environment Program (UNEP) explores three ideas to help solve the seemingly insurmountable mountain of plastic piling up and help clean up the oceans.

1. Plastic Design 2.0: Cars, homes, air fryers, laptops and modern essentials have plastic components—with few cheaper alternatives available. UNEP argues that better design decisions (such as dyes, material combinations and size) could help recycle majority of the plastic.

Solution?: Establish design rules that favour reuse or recycle and standardize formats that can be shared across companies.

Result: Recycling profitability could double and lead to a 48% drop in greenhouse gas emissions, UNEP projects.

2. Build collection infrastructure. Globally, more than two billion people are not connected to waste collection systems.

Solution?: Aligning the collection and sorting processes with recycling systems can ensure recycled plastic matches the quality, consistency and grade requirements for new plastic. Governments can de-risk recycling infrastructure with long-term offtake agreements. Result: “Mechanical recycle,” based on proven technologies, and chemical conversion tech (controversial due to its higher eco-footprint) can recreate plastics from existing materials.

3. One country’s trash…: The UNEP recommends doubling down on recycle trade economics.

Solution: Legally binding frameworks for trade in plastic waste will create transparency, curb illegal dumping, and save countries from embarrassing situations (Read the Canada-Philippines waste dispute). Result: Powerful incentive for the private sector, governments and other stakeholders to facilitate and develop recycling technologies.

Further reading: UNEP: How the world can end plastic pollution

ZEROING IN

About that decoupling from China: the country will still be home to 65% of global clean technology manufacturing capacity by 2030, according to a new International Energy Agency forecast. While the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act, Canada’s green incentives and Europe’s Net Zero Industry Act will expand clean energy infrastructure in the West, China’s dominance in clean energy supply chains will remain intact for the foreseeable future, according to a new International Energy Agency forecast:

Source: International Energy Agency

PUBLIC POLICY

Lost in the haze of a new Cold Conflict with Russia and China was the G7’s Clean Energy Economy Action Plan unveiled in Hiroshima last week.

Some top takeaways from the CEEAP blueprint:

Zero-sum competition: G7 pledged not to fight over green investments—that’s a nod to the infighting already evident with Canada and the European Union trying to lure automakers and others from the hypnotic charms of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act.

Emissions accounting is coming: Markets must account for embedded emissions in traded goods and supply chains to ensure countries cavalier with their emissions are aligned with global climate goals. The G7 has asked the OECD “to explore methodological approaches for computing carbon intensity of goods or sectors.”

No ally left behind: While G7 countries are signing critical minerals pacts with each other, most of the resources lie in emerging economies. The G7 Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) aims to tap resources of emerging countries, bringing them along the Net Zero journey and ensuring a more just energy transition, at least in theory. The PGII is a direct response to China’s sprawling Belt and Road program that aims to connect various emerging markets through ports and other infrastructure.

Climate finance: There was more talk of climate finance for low-income economies vulnerable to climate change. The World Bank is tasked with addressing the challenge.

Further reading: The G7 Clean Energy Economy Action Plan

G7 Climate Club, Reversing Biodiversity Loss & The King’s Emission

PUBLIC POLICY

Germany is pushing for more natural gas investments, while China (along with India, which is also invited) is seeking “multiple pathways” for fossil fuel use, setting up a clash with partners at the G7 Summit starting in Hiroshima, Japan, today.

Germany sees natural gas as “a transitional source of energy,” arguing that its hurriedly built liquefied natural gas import terminals can be repurposed for hydrogen when that technology achieves scale, while China and India say a one-size-fits-all energy path doesn’t meet their needs.

With G7 seeking to undermine future Russian energy output at the summit, agreement on pathways (plural) to achieve energy transition has become more pressing.

There are a number of energy security, environmental and geopolitical issues on the G7 agenda. We will also be watching for developments on the “Climate Club,” that was fleshed out at the G7 summit in Germany last year.

Who can join the club and what will its framework look like? The Asian Development Bank Institute has a few ideas:

Further Reading:

Read the G7 Finance Ministers’ communique here. Read the Asian Development Bank Institute’s report here.

BUILDINGS

Buildings have long been at the heart of Canada’s emissions problem, generating an eighth of our emissions, or some 90 million tonnes (MT) of carbon dioxide each year. And those emissions are rising, as more houses and commercial spaces heated with natural gas are built.

A new RBC Climate Action Institute report explores the scale of the building challenge in Canada:

Read the full report here.

BIODVERSITY

The wildfires currently raging in Alberta have already destroyed just over half a million hectares: that’s precious biodiversity lost in weeks.

The makes the federal government’s public consultations launched this week to shape Canada’s 2030 Biodiversity Strategy even more urgent. The accompanying document, “Halting And Reversing Natural Loss,” lays out the challenge of protecting the country’s habitats in the face of climate change and rapid development.

Canada’s 2030 strategy builds on the Biodiversity COP15 Summit in Montreal last year—dubbed by some as nature’s “Paris Accord” moment—that ended with countries signing a landmark Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) to protect biodiversity, restore ecosystems and protect Indigenous rights.

Canada has had early success in protecting 300,000 square kilometres of land since 2015 and 14% of oceans protected (from 1% previously). But the frequency of volatile weather events such as droughts, wildfires, floods suggest a constant state of vigilance.

Indigenous stewards: Engaging Indigenous groups and ensuring provincial and municipal buy-in are critical to achieving the stated goal of protecting 30% of Canada’s land and water by 2030. More than a 1,000 Indigenous guardians have been stewarding various conservation initiatives across the country and that number will only grow, according to Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault. Tree inflation: The government helped plant 30 million trees in 2021, and 60 million in 2022, but the effort will need to be at a “cruising altitude” of 300 million trees a year to get to Canada’s target of two billion by 2030, the Minister said.

Ecology and economy: Coordinating the efforts of more than 3,500 municipal, regional, Indigenous, and other local governments responsible for many direct, on-the-ground conservation activities will be a major undertaking. Another challenge would be to calibrate Canada’s growing economic needs—housing, infrastructure and industry—with a lighter footprint on the country’s ecology.

Further Reading: Toward a 2030 Biodiversity Strategy for Canada: Halting and reversing nature loss.

ZEROING IN

Capturing and storing carbon in the U.S. is emerging as a massive investment opportunity as the Inflation Reduction Act tax credits roll out. A new U.S. Department of Energy report on the carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) opportunity identifies the scale, and challenge, of the country’s energy transition:

Source: U.S. Department of Energy

EMISSIONS

The King recycles. While it’s hard to imagine the newly crowned King Charles III sorting out plastic from organics himself, the Royal household has a history of recycling food waste, glass, plastic, and paper across its palaces. Windsor Castle is powered by hydroelectricity, Balmoral by geothermal, and LED bulbs and smart meters dot the vast estate. Biodiversity is also a key consideration across the properties with long-grass policy, limited use of pesticides, and the recent introduction of bee hives at Buckingham Palace.

Still, latest data shows the Royal household’s greenhouse gas emissions shot up in 2022 on heating, owned/leased vehicles, and a 46% increase in business travel from the pre-pandemic levels.

A princely warning: Over the decades, the new King has earned a reputation as an environmentally-conscious heir apparent. At a G20 summit in Rome in 2021, the-then Prince of Wales warned policymakers representing the world’s most powerful economies that it’s “quite literally the last-chance saloon,” to forge public-private partnerships and secure trillions of dollars needed to mitigate the impact of climate change. Famously, he was discouraged from giving a major speech at COP27 in Egypt last year by then Prime Minister Liz Truss.

Call to private sector: As prince, Charles also launched the Sustainable Markets Initiative at The World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos in 2020, backed by 500 CEOs, to accelerate the private sector’s transition to a sustainable future. The SMI’s mandate, Terra Carta, proposes a set of principles that puts nature, people and planet at the centre of global value creation.

Earthshot Prize: The Royal Foundation and Prince William, the current Prince of Wales, created the £1million Earthshot Prize Awards last year to reward companies fighting climate

change. Winners included an Omani company mineralizing CO2 in rock, and an Australia-based Indigenous women’s group protecting the Great Barrier Reef.

Royal emissions: With support for the monarchy at a historic low in the U.K. (and in Canada), burnishing the new king’s climate credentials could help shed an (LED) light on climate change. A good place to start: the Royal household’s own emissions.

Recharging Canada’s EV Sales, The Cost Of Oil Sands Phaseout & Lithium Deficit

TRANSPORTATION

Is Canada on track to ensure all auto sales by 2035 will be zero-emissions? At current pace, we are on course to fall short of the target, according to projections by BloombergNEF and RBC Climate Action Institute. EVs would also account for only 38% of all Canadian car stock—short of the 50% target needed to reach the overall goal, BNEF projects. Boosting EV car stock is critical in making a dent in emissions.

A spate of investments, including generous incentives, is pouring in to bolster Canada’s EV supply chain and safeguard the auto industry’s future. But hitting 100% sales target in just over a decade would require massive consumer buy-in. Industry will have to address affordability challenges and improve charging infrastructure to spark broader adoption.

Charger anxiety: A third of Canadians polled by KPMG were reluctant to buy an EV due to charger anxiety, among other factors. Another third of those polled would prefer a hybrid (for fear of running out of battery juice).

But EV owners are hooked: A vast majority of Canadian EVs owners polled in a separate survey in March expect their next car to also be an EV, given its lower operation costs, driving enjoyment and “quietness of ride,” compared to combustion cars. Still, nearly half of EV owners hesitate to take their cars on long road trips, and two-thirds own a gas vehicle for longer journeys, according to a PlugShare survey.

Perception & reality: Before purchasing an EV, around two-thirds of those polled believed their EV’s range was their most serious concern, but that dropped to nearly a third after owning the vehicle. Crucially—and this is arguably the biggest issue to address—before owning a vehicle, 66% worried about access to public charging stations, and that figure remained a significant 44% after owning an EV.

RCAI’s research shows Canada is lagging others countries when it comes to charging infrastructure. Canada’s EV charging and refuelling infrastructure targets call for 84,500 chargers (current status: ~21,500) and 25 hydrogen stations (current status: 5) to be deployed by 2029.

SKILLS

The latest International Renewable Energy Agency outlook has a number of interesting data points—such as US$44 trillion needed globally this decade to remain in the 1.5°C Scenario until 2030—but what caught our eye is the focus on skillsets, which IRENA believes will be the “lynchpin” of a successful energy transition.

The last point is contentious in Alberta. The federal government, which has moved away from the troubling “just transition” phrase to “sustainable jobs,” laid out a 32-page plan in February to pivot from combustion-energy to clean-energy jobs. A federal bill is forthcoming, but the two main political parties in Alberta, now in the midst of an election cycle, are opposed to it—at least for now.

Canada’s skills shortages are well documented, and may be exacerbated by provinces and federal governments’ inability to find common ground. At stake are thousands of jobs and the country’s energy and climate security. If Canada can get its policies right, around 400,000 new green jobs can be created, according to RBC estimates.

ZEROING IN

The world needs to embark on a more sustainable agriculture path—and fast. The vital sector is draining resources, remains carbon-intensive and eroding biodiversity. A new report examines the natural capital being consumed by the sector:

Source: Bloomberg NEF BNEF (bbhub.io)

Further reading:

CRITICAL MINERALS

Chile’s decision to nationalize its lithium mines highlights the precariousness of the resources vital in building decarbonized sectors. While the move is aimed at boosting Chile’s production, analysts question the major producer’s ability to raise output on its own. The move comes on the heels of Mexico nationalizing lithium mining and extraction earlier this year, and is part of a wider expansion challenge facing “green metals” at a time when they are expected to play a key role in decarbonization. While alternatives are also gaining traction, lithium-ion batteries are expected to power the global electric vehicle industry and cut transportation sector’s emissions.

Global scramble: Lithium is facing a supply deficit just as major automakers are ramping up EV production. Germany restarted a mothballed fluorspar mine—a metal known as “lithium’s little brother”—after 27 years in a desperate measure to gain some self-sufficiency in EV batteries for its all-important auto sector. Capital spending on lithium extraction globally hit a record US$467 million in 2022, the highest since S&P Global Ratings started tracking the commodity in 2010, as the industry eyes more politically-stable jurisdictions.

Canada’s lithium play: Last year, Ottawa signed deals with two major German automakers to tap Canada’s battery minerals, including lithium, cobalt, nickel and graphite. Tesla, which is building a lithium refinery in Texas, signed a deal earlier this year to source high-purity lithium ore from a Quebec mine. Canada has the world’s 6th largest lithium reserves but negligible production, with a few companies suffering bankruptcies over the past few years. The absence of an active lithium mining and processing sector remains another challenge. Still, a number of promising lithium projects have advanced in Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec, Alberta and Saskatchewan. Canada also forced Chinese companies to divest from Canadian-listed lithium companies last year to secure its supplies.

Brine credits: To help feed the North American EV sector, the federal government’s 2023 budget expanded the eligibility of the Critical Mineral Exploration Tax Credit to lithium from brines and allow producers of lithium from brines to issue flow-through shares (effectively a tax deduction). That would benefit several tech-intensive lithium brine projects in Alberta and Saskatchewan eyeing lithium extraction from oil and gas fields and industrial wastewater.

ENERGY

Phasing out the oil sands to get to Net Zero? That’s one way, but Canada will be poorer for it, with limited environmental gains. An accelerated push to phaseout the oil industry would trigger a $100-billion GDP loss, a deep recession, lower incomes, and declining exports by 2050. That’s the projection of a new Public Policy Forum report. Part of the Energy Future Forum project that features RBC as a member, the forum explores practical ways for Canada to get to Net Zero by 2050.

Conflating emissions with fossil fuels is not helpful. To be clear, Canada needs to implement new policies as the current levers leave us well short of Net Zero targets. But energy reliability and affordability, and economic prosperity, should not play a secondary role to emissions reduction. We can find better ways.

India’s Emissions Challenge, AI’s Dark Side & Rise of Renewable Natural Gas

ENERGY

India, which recently surpassed China as the world’s most populous country, has a major climate challenge on its hands. The South Asian nation’s 1.4-billion strong population is powering the economy to new heights with GDP expected to vault past Japan and Germany by 2030 to become the third largest economy after the U.S. and China. India already has the third largest emissions footprint on the planet—can it manage emissions without sacrificing economic expansion?

Here’s a quick look at India’s energy trends over the past decade:

Middle class boom: Some estimates show India’s middle class will grow from just under a third of its current population to almost two-thirds by 2047. That’s a lot of new people eyeing the necessities of modern life: cars, refrigerators, phones, housing, utilities and food—all requiring energy and emissions intensive processes.

Climate Ambition: The runaway growth has also meant that India is home to five of the 10 most polluted cities in the world. Plans to raise non-fossil fuel power capacity to 50% by 2030 is part of an overarching plan to get to Net Zero by 2070, but Climate Action Tracker deems India’s climate policies and actions “insufficient.” The country is investing heavily in solar parks, wind farms and hydro, while the government launched Mission LiFE (Lifestyle for Environment), aimed at changing individual behaviour.

What can Canadian companies offer India?: There’s no shortage of companies wooing India. Middle East, European and Russian conventional and cleaner energy producers are well-entrenched in the Indian supply chain, while U.S. LNG producers have ramped up exports to the South Asian nation. Canada’s Indo-Pacific strategy focuses on clean technology, but Canadian companies have barely scratched the surface of India’s energy potential, including its efforts to develop green hydrogen, solar and wind projects.

A new way: India, along with China, also recently pushed for “multiple energy pathways,” that allows some G20 countries to choose a roadmap to cut carbon emissions instead of setting a deadline to end the use of fossil fuels. The issue will likely come up again at COP28 being held in the UAE later this year.

ENERGY

Expect renewable natural gas (RNG) projects to more than double in Canada over the next few years, as policy changes and provincial mandates take effect. As many as 18 new projects are underway taking Canada’s total RNG capacity to 17.1 petajoules, from 7.2 petajoules in 2021, according to the Canada Energy Regulator.

How is it produced?: Biogas used to produce RNG is sourced from solid waste landfills, livestock farms, and organic waste management operations, among others, through a biochemical process, such as anaerobic digestion. Its key superpower: RNG captures and recovers methane, a potent greenhouse gas. RNG is also indistinguishable from conventional gas once processed and can be injected into existing natural gas pipeline to power transportation, industry and homes.

Quebec leads: The province was the first in Canada to mandate inclusion of RNG in natural gas, with a target to blend a minimum of 5% RNG in natural gas by 2025. British Columbia has a committed to 15% renewable content by 2030. Utilities are teaming up with farmers to leverage their organic waste and build biogas facilities and cut agriculture emissions that account for around 10% of Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions.

Emissions: An inspirational target set by Canadian utilities to blend 10% of RNG in the mix by 2030, would lead to a 24 million tonne reduction of GHG emissions—equivalent to removing 5.2 million cars off the road, according to the Canadian Gas Association.

Challenges?: There are a few. Anaerobic digester facilities face long regulatory timelines, while scale is another issue facing smaller facilities. The federal government is seeking feedback for a proposed regulatory framework to reduce Canada’s landfill methane emissions, which could give RNG a boost.

TECHNOLOGY

When the “Godfather of AI” says he regrets his life’s work and we may have gone too far with the technology, it’s time to take notice. Geoffrey Hinton, who pioneered artificial intelligence systems that are the bedrock of new AI iterations such as ChatGPT, is warning that the unregulated technology could soon flood us with fake photos and videos and upend labour markets. This has far-reaching repercussions for the entire energy and climate complex, too.

The Good: AI is seen as a promising tool to mitigate climate change. Its ability to process detailed climate data and models, and quickly detect changes in complex locations such as oceans, near-space and the Arctic could be vital in proactively managing crises, according to Jim Bellingham, executive director of the Johns Hopkins Institute for Assured Autonomy. Other applications include using AI to build low-emissions materials for electric cars, solar panels and wind turbines that are lighter, stronger and cheaper.

University of Toronto was recently the biggest recipient of a $200-million grant from the Canada First Research Excellence Fund for a project that combines artificial intelligence, robotics and advanced computing to discover new materials and molecules at a fraction of the usual time and cost. “Applications include everything from life-saving medications and biodegradable plastics to low-carbon cement and renewable energy,” UofT said.

The Bad: But Geoffrey Hinton, and a number of other thought leaders in the space, are gripped by AI’s supercharged ability to spread misinformation. That could seep into political discourse and set back discussions and decisions on climate change and biodiversity. Hinton also warned that it will be hard to stop “bad actors from using it for bad things,”—and the possibilities are endless.

The Ugly: As historian Yuval Hariri wrote in the New York Times, while AI can invent new solutions for climate and energy crises, “it doesn’t matter how high the skyscraper of benefits AI assembles if the foundation collapses.”

PUBLIC POLICY

Scaling down down Canada’s emissions to 440 Mt by 2030 from its current levels of 670 MT will require cuts equal to around four times the drop seen during the pandemic, according to a new RBC Climate Action Institute analysis.

While existing policies have moved the needle, achieving Ottawa’s target of 40% lower emissions by 2030 will require a harder push from industry and federal and provincial policymakers.

While oil and gas sector has the steepest challenge, population growth and economic expansion means agriculture, building and transportation sectors must also find ways to grow without expanding their emissions footprint.

Read the full report here to explore the challenges facing provinces and key sectors to meet 2030 targets.

ZEROING IN

The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada came into effect in 2109 to streamline federal and provincial decisions on infrastructure projects. It is early days, but the process has struggled to accelerate decision-making, according to a new Canada West Foundation report.

Source: Canada West Foundation

How To Upgrade Alberta’s Climate Plan, Canada’s Gas Choices & E-Scooters’ Rough Ride

PUBLIC POLICY

Canada would struggle to hit its Net Zero targets with Alberta pulling along in the same direction. The province released its Emissions Reduction and Energy Development Plan days after Canada’s latest emissions report showed the province’s emissions rose 8%, even as national emissions reversed 8% in 2021 vs 2005. The reason: Oilsands production in Alberta surged 775% and emissions shot up 460% to 70 metric tonnes since the 1990s. On the flip side: the world needed Canadian oil and higher production generated tax revenues, economic activity and shareholder wealth.

Skeptics argue that the EREDP doesn’t have a clear path forward (Pembina Institute said the plan lacked “key elements of credible strategy.”)

Here’s how the province could upgrade its plan:

Further Reading:

Emissions Reduction and Energy Development Plan | Alberta.ca

PUBLIC POLICY

The G7 environment ministers’ behind-the-scenes divisions in Japan could foreshadow what’s to come later in the year at COP28 in Dubai, UAE.

Crucially, the ministers agreed to phase-out “unabated fossil fuels” to achieve Net Zero by 2050 in their 36-page communiqué—that commitment had failed to make the cut at COP27, as Saudi Arabia, China and others prevailed. Japan’s push for greater support for natural gas (and hydrogen) was also diluted in the final draft; in a compromise, no timeline was set for phasing out coal-fired power plants. (As an aside, the word “unabated” means oil and gas producers must double-down on carbon capture and other emissions-cutting tech).

New Climate Bargain: Expect more climate bargaining to come as COP28 host UAE, a major hydrocarbons producer, and its allies, counter the G7 call. The challenge will be to remain true to Net Zero. Compromise is already in the air, with Sultan Al Jaber, President of COP28 (and CEO of state-owned Abu Dhabi National Oil Co.) advocating “a pragmatic energy transition.” While some have questioned the merits of an oil CEO running the world’s most influential climate platform, hydrocarbon hubs such as the UAE are also where the biggest climate fights are taking place, and the stakes are even more consequential for economies of the so-called “Global South.”

Further Reading: A Kingdom Built On Oil Now Controls the World’s Climate Progress

TRANSPORTATION

E-scooters seem like an eco-friendly, fun solution for last mile and quick trips, but the two-wheelers have divided people. Parisians said au revoir to the 15,000-scooter services recently in a stunning 89% vote against it (even the pro-cycling Socialist Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo supported the ban). In the UK, the National Federation of the Blind thinks e-scooters are unlike bikes and a danger to the blind and visually impaired, while the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act Alliance considers them a “silent menace.”

What’s the case against e-scooters?: They clutter roads and often have lower age limits than other modes of transport. E-scooters have been blamed for deaths and serious accidents in many cities. (There are also concerns about recycling but that’s not unique to e-scooters).

What about their eco credentials? Research by the International Transport Forum suggests e-scooters’ environmental impact is lower than taxis, ride-sharing services, private cars, but “shared mobility services have the highest energy and GHG emission impacts/per km of all urban mobility options.” New generation of e-scooters have swappable batteries that add to greenhouse gas emissions per kilometer, but it could also extend their life. Another study notes that the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with e-scooter use is higher in 65% “than the suite of modes of transportation that are displaced.”

Also, use of e-scooters and other shared micro transportation services could displace the most eco-friendly practice in mobility: walking. It’s going to be hard for e-scooters to compete with increasingly-electrifying public transport in major Canadian cities. But with cost of gas rising, it remains a tempting option for many.

Where do Canadian cities stand on e-scooters?: Many large Canadian cities, notably Toronto has banned e-scooter services, but some cities such as Vancouver approved a three-year electric kick scooter pilot program starting in 2021, with restrictions. E-scooters are set to return to Ottawa in May, subject to stricter rules.

ENERGY

resource could unlock a fresh wave of economic activity and help cut global emissions. But we risk missing our Net Zero targets without major investments in abatement technologies.

Canada’s Conundrum: Three Ways To Address The World’s Gas & Climate Crises, a new report by RBC Climate Action Institute, explores three roles Canada can play to boost global energy and environmental security:

Read the full report here.

ZEROING IN

Electric vehicles are steadily raising their market share, not just in the key markets of China, U.S. and Europe, but also in a number of promising emerging markets, according to a new report by the International Energy Agency. Some highlights include:

Source: International Energy Agency, Statistics Canada

Supercharging A Mining Boom, Warming Up To Heat Pumps & Earth Day Questions

TRANSPORTATION

North America’s electric vehicle sector has moved into the fast lane. A new U.S. proposal to impose strict emissions rules on conventional cars is set to boost EV sales in the country, with the added bonus of cutting U.S. oil imports by 20 billion barrels (CC: Canadian oil producers) and avoiding 10 billion tons of CO2 emissions—more than twice the total U.S. CO2 emissions in 2022. But a lot more critical minerals will be needed to reach the U.S.’s stated target of EVs making up 66% of all cars sales by 2032.

The hunt for raw materials: While lack of charging infrastructure could slow EV sales, an even bigger concern is the looming raw material shortage that could restrict supply. Western countries and auto makers are scrambling for increasingly-expensive lithium, copper, nickel and rare earth materials, that’s adding to costs. G7 environment ministers’ latest communique after a meeting last week in Sapporo, Japan, stressed the importance of strengthening critical minerals and materials supply chains towards a Net Zero economy.

Canada’s opportunity: Don’t expect the transition from combustion to clean vehicles to be easy and on time, but the U.S. move is a boon for Canadian mining.

The sector got a big boost with Ottawa proposing investment tax credit for mining companies in the 2023 federal budget. A $3.8-billion Critical Minerals Strategy was announced in the 2022 budget aimed at taking advantage of the U.S.’s Buy North American provisions and the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act. The Feds also launched the $1.5-billion Critical Minerals Infrastructure Fund towards energy and transportation projects needed to unlock mineral-rich deposits. Canada has already signed a joint-action plan with the U.S., EU and Japan as it positions itself as a provider of critical minerals.

What’s missing?: Engagement with Indigenous groups, which is impeding development of clean-energy infrastructure projects—a critical Canadian weakness. Many mineral-rich deposits such as the Ring of Fire in Ontario, straddle Indigenous territory and need their capital—natural, financial, intellectual and human, as outlined in our recent report 92 to Zero—before projects can proceed.

BUILDINGS

There is a quiet climate revolution breezing through the world’s ventilation systems. Heat pump purchases in the U.S. exceeded those of natural gas furnaces in 2022, part of a global uptick in sales of the heating and cooling system.

What are heat pumps, again?: Similar to furnaces or boilers, heat pumps can be two to three times more efficient than other electric home heating sources—making them a favourite among environmental economists. Heat pumps have had a slow uptake in Canada as they are less optimal in sub-freezing conditions, but that’s changing as more efficient upgrades emerge.

So, the world’s warming up to them?: Yes, global sales of heat pumps jumped almost 11% in 2022—a second year of double-digit growth, International Energy Agency data shows. Europe saw a 40% surge in sales as the continent worked hard to cut its dependence on Russian natural gas exports. Globally, heat pumps (when used as a main heating device) account for 10% of the heat needs of buildings—and are expected to reach 20% by 2030 to meet global climate pledges.

Installing heat pumps require high upfront costs but the technology has benefitted from strong financial incentives in 30 countries, with subsidy levels rising in a number of countries. The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act, for example, offers federal income tax credits for installing heat pumps. Global supply chains in the space are currently stretched, especially for chips, but manufacturing incentives in the U.S. and EU should boost supplies.

Why is Canada cool on heat pumps? The federal government sees heat pump adoption as one of the ways to bring down building emissions that account for 13% of Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions. But sales have crawled. Heat pumps had a 5.3% market share in 2019 of the Canadian heat and ventilation market, but Emissions Reduction Plan policies could help double that by 2030, the Canadian Climate Institute estimates.

How can Canada spur faster heat pump adoption? Here are three ways:

FINANCING

The biggest news in climate last week didn’t make the news. But it could make history.

The world’s leading economic powers met in Washington and agreed to reforms for the World Bank that will allow the institution to lend an additional $50 billion over 10 years to low- and middle-income countries to fight climate change. It’s an important step towards helping developing countries invest now in cleaner energy and industrial processes.

We’ll have to do a lot more. The Peterson Institute for International Economics figures the world’s developing economies, which will account for the overwhelming growth of greenhouse gas emissions in the coming decades, need a seven-fold increase in climate-related investments. Most of that can come from the private sector, but there needs to be a lot more government-backed lending, too, to reduce the risk for other investors.

Enter multilateral development banks like the World Bank, Asia Development Bank and African Development Bank. They provided US$20 billion in climate financing in 2020, compared to the US$66-111 billion of government-backed loans the Peterson Institute estimates will be needed to fight climate change.

To get that sort of capital, the West will need to invest a lot more in the World Bank and others like it – or let China and other growing middle-income countries play a greater role. Both options are challenged because of fiscal restraint in the West and Washington’s desire to keep Chinese influence at bay.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told the Bank to do more with what it has. Finance ministers from developing countries also came to Washington to share concerns about climate overtaking poverty alleviation as a global priority, as they find governments and investors looking eagerly to invest in solar farms over primary schools.

If the U.S. and other major World Bank shareholders don’t continue to push for reforms and more capital, they may find their climate ambitions to be a day late and a dollar short.

PUBLIC POLICY

Canada’s 2023 federal budget offers a significant response to the United States’ multi-billion dollar Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), but a Net Zero investment wave could face headwinds from rising international competition, regulatory impediments and the difficulty in getting provinces on board.

The budget’s new green measures are focused on bolstering the upstream supply chain for a low-carbon economy with new refundable investment tax credits (ITC) for clean electricity, clean-technology manufacturing, and hydrogen. Combined with carbon capture and cleantech ITCs announced over the past year, the federal government expects to spend about $80 billion over 10 years on green investment tax credits.

The measures compare favourably to IRA, but RBC Climate Action Institute’s new Policy Insight, Will Budget 2023 Spark A Green Investment Wave?, explains why Canada’s efforts to secure green investments could still face challenges.

The measures compare favourably to IRA, but RBC Climate Action Institute’s new Policy Insight, Will Budget 2023 Spark A Green Investment Wave?, explains why Canada’s efforts to secure green investments could still face challenges.

ZEROING IN

Some good news in the run-up to Earth Day on April 22: Canada’s 2023 National Inventory Report shows some progress towards climate action. Still, there’s a long way to go to reach Canada’s 2030 emissions reduction targets. Some key stats from the latest NIR:

Source: National Inventory Report

Disclaimer

This article is intended as general information only and is not to be relied upon as constituting legal, financial or other professional advice. A professional advisor should be consulted regarding your specific situation. Information presented is believed to be factual and up-to-date but we do not guarantee its accuracy and it should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the authors as of the date of publication and are subject to change. No endorsement of any third parties or their advice, opinions, information, products or services is expressly given or implied by Royal Bank of Canada or any of its affiliates.

By Yadullah HussainJuly 28, 2023

August 4, 2023

August 4, 2023

August 2, 2023